From owner-freebsd-chat Wed Apr 29 13:22:44 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id NAA20539 for freebsd-chat-outgoing; Wed, 29 Apr 1998 13:22:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from hwcn.org (ac199@james.hwcn.org [199.212.94.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id NAA20513 for ; Wed, 29 Apr 1998 13:22:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from hoek@hwcn.org) Received: from localhost (ac199@localhost) by hwcn.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id QAA27976; Wed, 29 Apr 1998 16:17:25 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 1998 16:17:25 -0400 (EDT) From: Tim Vanderhoek To: Don Wilde cc: Matthew Hunt , freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Why is Win NT slower than others? In-Reply-To: <35469989.F2CD50DA@ibm.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Tue, 28 Apr 1998, Don Wilde wrote: > Sounds like MS debugging procedures: "reinstall until the problem or > your life goes away! Send us more money between each try!" A recent article (this month's The Economist, fwiw) tried to compare Gillette launching a new version of its razor (the much-vamped Mach3) with MS's constant product revisions... It was disappointing that, while the article accurately identified MS constant upgrades annoying consumers, it totally failed to grasp *why* (since the article's comparison doesn't fit in its context)... :-( -- Outnumbered? Maybe. Outspoken? Never! tIM...HOEk To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message