From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 7 13:28:25 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51BE016A4CE for ; Fri, 7 May 2004 13:28:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pittgoth.com (14.zlnp1.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.149.111]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D452743D1D for ; Fri, 7 May 2004 13:28:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from trhodes@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (acs-24-154-235-189.zoominternet.net [24.154.235.189]) (authenticated bits=0) by pittgoth.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i47KSMkF052132 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 7 May 2004 16:28:23 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from trhodes@FreeBSD.org) Date: Fri, 7 May 2004 16:28:49 -0400 From: Tom Rhodes To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Message-Id: <20040507162849.5970f54d@localhost> In-Reply-To: <200405072219.03411.platanthera@web.de> References: <200405031458.18887.platanthera@web.de> <200405070410.06612.platanthera@web.de> <20040507005732.68446e8a@localhost> <200405072219.03411.platanthera@web.de> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.10claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: handbook, section 15.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 May 2004 20:28:25 -0000 On Fri, 7 May 2004 22:19:03 +0200 platanthera wrote: > On Friday 07 May 2004 06:57, Tom Rhodes wrote: > > On Fri, 7 May 2004 04:10:06 +0200 > > platanthera wrote: > > > and i've got a question. i've frequently used > > > xxx/yyy - sometimes the link the respective pkg_descr works, > > > sometimes it does not. why? > > > > It all depends. Sometimes a port only has a Makefile in the > > directory because it's more of a 'cut from larger port'. Which > > port are you having the actual problems with? > > the port descriptions are ok. my patch was buggy > > sorry No need to apologize, it happens. :) I'm almost done with my new chapter, hopefully I can look at your patch later on this evening. :) -- Tom Rhodes