Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 13:59:56 -0800 From: Kent Stewart <kstewart@owt.com> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: knu@FreeBSD.org, Roger Merritt <mcrogerm@stjohn.ac.th>, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org, jesper@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Portsupgrade -uU Message-ID: <3DDD575C.1020809@owt.com> References: <BA011293.2BD6%scott@g-it.ca> <BA011293.2BD6%scott@g-it.ca> <5.2.0.9.0.20021121132627.00a0e670@127.0.0.1> <20021121082130.GA17172@rot13.obsecurity.org> <3DDD31E8.5040208@owt.com> <3DDD4904.5030407@owt.com> <20021121214315.GA20447@rot13.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 12:58:44PM -0800, Kent Stewart wrote: <snip> > I use the /usr/ports/Tools/portbuild/scripts/makeindex script on bento > that takes care of everything to generate a clean INDEX..I probably > should fold this back into 'make index' itself. I changed my uports script to use "make index" for the time being. > > >>Something is seriously wrong with the INDEX that portsdb -U generates. > > > Yes, it appears so. I've CC'ed knu@ > I fwd'ed what I had sent previously after I figured out that I had picked on jesper. What has me concerned at this point is what I produced with my "portupgrade -pufa" It was based on the bad INDEX produced by portsdb -uU and the resulting packages were upgraded on my slower machines. Kent -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3DDD575C.1020809>