From owner-freebsd-current Sun Nov 1 16:47:45 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id QAA07968 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Sun, 1 Nov 1998 16:47:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from relay.nuxi.com (nuxi.cs.ucdavis.edu [128.120.56.38]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id QAA07959 for ; Sun, 1 Nov 1998 16:47:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by relay.nuxi.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) id QAA22872; Sun, 1 Nov 1998 16:47:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien) Message-ID: <19981101164732.A22829@nuxi.com> Date: Sun, 1 Nov 1998 16:47:32 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" To: Dom Mitchell Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Shells for you and shells for me Reply-To: obrien@NUXI.com References: <3633C8F8.EF8E14D5@null.net> <19981026125133.A2717@netmonger.net> <19981029012621.A26396@nuxi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.93.2i In-Reply-To: ; from Dom Mitchell on Fri, Oct 30, 1998 at 01:25:20PM +0000 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 3.0-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD group X-PGP-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Keyid: 34F9F9D5 Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, Oct 30, 1998 at 01:25:20PM +0000, Dom Mitchell wrote: > To be frank, I think that pdksh is definitely something that we should > be looking at for that reason alone. If we import it into the tree > and leave it installed as /bin/ksh, then people can test it at their > leisure to see if it is worth replacing /bin/sh, and we also gain a > ksh. It's a good situation. This sounds like a good compromise. Unless there is serious objections, I'll look into doing this. -- -- David (obrien@NUXI.ucdavis.edu -or- obrien@FreeBSD.org) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message