From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 4 10:55:55 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFFAC16A4CF for ; Fri, 4 Jun 2004 10:55:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from av8-1-sn2.hy.skanova.net (av8-1-sn2.hy.skanova.net [81.228.8.110]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EB1043D46 for ; Fri, 4 Jun 2004 10:55:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ertr1013@student.uu.se) Received: by av8-1-sn2.hy.skanova.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id C9C5837E64; Fri, 4 Jun 2004 19:55:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp2-2-sn2.hy.skanova.net (smtp2-2-sn2.hy.skanova.net [81.228.8.178]) by av8-1-sn2.hy.skanova.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCDE437E57 for ; Fri, 4 Jun 2004 19:55:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: from falcon.midgard.homeip.net (h201n1fls24o1048.bredband.comhem.se [212.181.162.201]) by smtp2-2-sn2.hy.skanova.net (Postfix) with SMTP id CC14337E42 for ; Fri, 4 Jun 2004 19:55:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 66136 invoked by uid 1001); 4 Jun 2004 17:55:51 -0000 Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2004 19:55:51 +0200 From: Erik Trulsson To: "J.D. Bronson" Message-ID: <20040604175551.GA66111@falcon.midgard.homeip.net> Mail-Followup-To: "J.D. Bronson" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <6.1.1.1.2.20040604123158.00ab97d0@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6.1.1.1.2.20040604123158.00ab97d0@localhost> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: security level and fsck X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2004 17:55:56 -0000 On Fri, Jun 04, 2004 at 12:32:51PM -0500, J.D. Bronson wrote: > is there any connection to fsck not be able to run when > I am at security level 3 under 5.2.1? > > That seems odd, but sure seems to be the case. That sounds very likely. I would imagine that fsck needs write access to the raw disks in order to do its job, but such access is not allowed under securelevel 2 and above. fsck is normally run very early in the boot-sequence - before the securelevel is raised - so in normal operation that would not be any major problem. -- Erik Trulsson ertr1013@student.uu.se