From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 4 19:06:41 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CCC616A4CE for ; Sun, 4 Jul 2004 19:06:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from erg.verweg.com (erg.verweg.com [217.77.141.129]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC89843D39 for ; Sun, 4 Jul 2004 19:06:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stephanb@whacky.net) Received: from [192.168.1.104] (152.14.static.dsl.luna.net [217.77.152.14]) (authenticated bits=0) by erg.verweg.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i64J6ZYh007112 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Sun, 4 Jul 2004 21:06:36 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from stephanb@whacky.net) X-Authentication-Warning: erg.verweg.com: Host 152.14.static.dsl.luna.net [217.77.152.14] claimed to be [192.168.1.104] Message-ID: <40E8552C.7030204@whacky.net> Date: Sun, 04 Jul 2004 21:06:20 +0200 From: Stephan van Beerschoten User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.1 (X11/20040703) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Enigmail-Version: 0.84.1.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on erg.verweg.com Subject: LVM ? (not vinum!) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Jul 2004 19:06:41 -0000 Is there an implementation of an LVM in FreeBSD ? Vinum is not sufficient. I am looking for a true LVM where creating and resizing volumes is a must. Something like Solaris Disksuite with softpartitioning is something I could live with already, but it just does not seem to exist. Am I correct? I'd hate to have to consider Linux as the OS for this new platform because of the one flaw in FreeBSD I can't live with :( Thanks, Stephan