From owner-freebsd-mobile Fri Jan 21 7: 1:53 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Received: from argon.blackdawn.com (deepspace9.dcds.edu [207.231.151.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C90DD1544D for ; Fri, 21 Jan 2000 07:01:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from will@blackdawn.com) Received: by argon.blackdawn.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E50991997; Tue, 18 Jan 2000 17:28:47 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2000 17:28:47 -0500 From: Will Andrews To: Warner Losh Cc: FreeBSD Mobile Subject: Re: 4.0 Code freeze? Message-ID: <20000118172847.E457@argon.blackdawn.com> References: <20000117084445.A11343@student.rug.ac.be> <200001180539.WAA14475@harmony.village.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: <200001180539.WAA14475@harmony.village.org>; from imp@village.org on Mon, Jan 17, 2000 at 10:39:43PM -0700 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.0-CURRENT i386 Sender: owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Mon, Jan 17, 2000 at 10:39:43PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote: > In message <20000117084445.A11343@student.rug.ac.be> "Frank (sysadmin)" writes: > : So maybe this is the moment to make sure we won't need a separate PAO for 4.0? > > That moment was six months ago. No one seemed concerned about it > then. I can guess why. > There will likely be not much more additional support in 4.0 for the > "oldcard" pccard than we have right now. > > The general consensus that I've seen on nomads is to not waste efforts > doing a 4.0 PAO, but rather devote those efforts to newcard and 5.0. > any 4.x support will be on a MFC basis. So are we going to be doing more merging of PAO code over the next couple 4.x releases? --Will To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-mobile" in the body of the message