From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 3 12:40:47 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8456A37B401; Sat, 3 May 2003 12:40:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from whale.sunbay.crimea.ua (whale.sunbay.crimea.ua [212.110.138.65]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 145DB43FAF; Sat, 3 May 2003 12:40:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ru@whale.sunbay.crimea.ua) Received: from whale.sunbay.crimea.ua (ru@localhost [127.0.0.1]) h43Jed62013162 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 3 May 2003 22:40:40 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from ru@whale.sunbay.crimea.ua) Received: (from ru@localhost) by whale.sunbay.crimea.ua (8.12.9/8.12.8/Submit) id h43JedwV013161; Sat, 3 May 2003 22:40:39 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from ru) Date: Sat, 3 May 2003 22:40:39 +0300 From: Ruslan Ermilov To: Poul-Henning Kamp Message-ID: <20030503194039.GG97244@sunbay.com> References: <20030503192559.GE97244@sunbay.com> <21868.1051990078@critter.freebsd.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="iSeZnk6FyAS3EJ1y" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <21868.1051990078@critter.freebsd.dk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: Scott Long cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/release/scripts doFS.sh X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 May 2003 19:40:48 -0000 --iSeZnk6FyAS3EJ1y Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, May 03, 2003 at 09:27:58PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <20030503192559.GE97244@sunbay.com>, Ruslan Ermilov writes: > >> Log: > >> Use UFS1 for the floppies instead of UFS2 > >> > >Why? Does it save anything? Last time I tried, it did not. >=20 > UFS1 inodes are half the size of UFS2 inodes, so it may gain you > a bunch of sectors. >=20 I now see. I was about to suggest UFS1 for boot floppies, and thought I saw the difference, and even completed the email with the patch, but then tested it again and saw no difference in free space. I now know why, I even recall seeing a PR on the subject, something about UFS1, UFS2, and newfs(8): This is on an fd1440-labelled image: # newfs -O1 md0a /dev/md0a: 1.4MB (2880 sectors) block size 4096, fragment size 512 using 4 cylinder groups of 0.36MB, 91 blks, 192 inodes. super-block backups (for fsck -b #) at: 32, 760, 1488, 2216 # df /dev/md0a Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity Mounted on /dev/md0a 1279 0 1177 0% # newfs -O2 md0a /dev/md0a: 1.4MB (2880 sectors) block size 4096, fragment size 512 using 4 cylinder groups of 0.36MB, 91 blks, 192 inodes. super-block backups (for fsck -b #) at: 144, 872, 1600, 2328 # df /dev/md0a Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity Mounted on /dev/md0a 1127 0 1037 0% # newfs -O1 md0a /dev/md0a: 1.4MB (2880 sectors) block size 4096, fragment size 512 using 4 cylinder groups of 0.36MB, 91 blks, 192 inodes. super-block backups (for fsck -b #) at: 32, 760, 1488, 2216 # df /dev/md0a Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity Mounted on /dev/md0a 1127 0 1037 0% Cheers, --=20 Ruslan Ermilov Sysadmin and DBA, ru@sunbay.com Sunbay Software AG, ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer, +380.652.512.251 Simferopol, Ukraine http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve http://www.oracle.com Enabling The Information Age --iSeZnk6FyAS3EJ1y Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE+tBs3Ukv4P6juNwoRAi7jAJ9YiGdQ4gV4WchRZLnlxZVY/7De0wCfZBly yOpvUVlqr0Hx5SmyQMuUnKo= =iUAU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --iSeZnk6FyAS3EJ1y--