Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 14:25:49 +0300 From: Volodymyr Kostyrko <c.kworr@gmail.com> To: Andreas Nilsson <andrnils@gmail.com> Cc: FreeBSD Stable Mailing List <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Clang as default compiler Message-ID: <5050713D.4000400@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAPS9%2BSsCSsM2DPgdd=016yTf1tE6Y0d=7FV-h9NjXb_j3eET2Q@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAPS9%2BSsCSsM2DPgdd=016yTf1tE6Y0d=7FV-h9NjXb_j3eET2Q@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
12.09.2012 00:49, Andreas Nilsson wrote: > On another clang note: Is there a page specifying valid settings for > -march, my google-foo is failing me. Ie, I'm looking for the equivalent of > http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.7.1/gcc/i386-and-x86_002d64-Options.html#i386-and-x86_002d64-Options I'm using the minimum of: : | gcc -E -v -march=native - : | clang -E -v -march=native - because there are number of ports that still doesn't compile with clang or GCC4.6. > After successful install I went on to upgrade some ports. Is there a specif > PR to use for ports that fails with clang and does not specify to use gcc ( > devel/cdecl and deskutils/calibre so were the culprits so far) It's up to you to fix this ports and submit patches. You can always rollback to using GCC. -- Sphinx of black quartz judge my vow.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5050713D.4000400>