Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2012 23:46:55 -0700 From: Jason Helfman <jgh@freebsd.org> To: Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org> Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r302327 - head/games/glightoff Message-ID: <CAMuy=%2Bgu%2BgT3cBNR5Kp-pVPVcY7rts79NyN4g=jkQGasyjxaKQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <50235A07.8010606@FreeBSD.org> References: <201208090545.q795jEAS072648@svn.freebsd.org> <50235A07.8010606@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 11:34 PM, Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org> wrote: > On 08/08/2012 10:45 PM, Jason Helfman wrote: > > - bump not necessary as other dependencies require pkgconf within > existing > > attribute > > I'm not sure what this means, but does this particular thing require > pkgconf to configure/build? If so, can you please add a USE_PKGCONFIG= > build? > > Reason being that as we remove the bogus run-dep on pkgconf, and as > people start to rely more on packages, it will become more common for > people to install a system that doesn't already have pkgconf, and then > potentially want to update this one thing via the ports. So if it needs > pkgconf to build, it should have that as a build dep. > > Doug > > USE_GNOME= glib20 gtk20 intltool already bring in pkgconf, and these require it to build. Also so this from bapt: More than that lots of ports do not even care about pkg-config because they do depend on glib20 or xproto which run depend on it. so fixing/changing USE_GNOME= pkgconfig cannot be done in one shot, too much impact. -jgh -- Jason Helfman | FreeBSD Committer jgh@FreeBSD.org | http://people.freebsd.org/~jgh
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAMuy=%2Bgu%2BgT3cBNR5Kp-pVPVcY7rts79NyN4g=jkQGasyjxaKQ>