From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Apr 15 13:53:37 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id NAA10828 for freebsd-ports-outgoing; Wed, 15 Apr 1998 13:53:37 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from news1.gtn.com (news1.gtn.com [192.109.159.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id UAA10729 for ; Wed, 15 Apr 1998 20:53:11 GMT (envelope-from andreas@klemm.gtn.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by news1.gtn.com (8.8.6/8.8.6) with UUCP id WAA22105 for ports@FreeBSD.ORG; Wed, 15 Apr 1998 22:30:09 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from andreas@localhost) by klemm.gtn.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id WAA06513; Wed, 15 Apr 1998 22:16:09 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from andreas) Message-ID: <19980415221609.40253@klemm.gtn.com> Date: Wed, 15 Apr 1998 22:16:09 +0200 From: Andreas Klemm To: ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: no satan port yet ??? Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.89.1i X-Disclaimer: A free society is one where it is safe to be unpopular X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 3.0-CURRENT SMP Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I wonder why we still don't have a satan port ? http://www.trouble.org/~zen/satan/satan.html Is it the way satan works or has to be installed ? Or any difficulties porting it ??? Just curious... -- Andreas Klemm http://www.FreeBSD.ORG/~andreas What gives you 90% more speed, for example in kernel compilation ? http://www.FreeBSD.ORG/~fsmp/SMP/akgraph-a/graph1.html powered by ,,symmetric multiprocessor FreeBSD'' To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message