From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 1 06:40:10 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D852037B401; Thu, 1 May 2003 06:40:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gw.nectar.cc (gw.nectar.cc [208.42.49.153]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00B7943FA3; Thu, 1 May 2003 06:40:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nectar@celabo.org) Received: from madman.celabo.org (madman.celabo.org [10.0.1.111]) (using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits)) (Client CN "madman.celabo.org", Issuer "celabo.org CA" (verified OK)) by gw.nectar.cc (Postfix) with ESMTP id 792715; Thu, 1 May 2003 08:40:08 -0500 (CDT) Received: by madman.celabo.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id C8A8F78C4A; Thu, 1 May 2003 08:40:07 -0500 (CDT) Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 08:40:07 -0500 From: "Jacques A. Vidrine" To: Makoto Matsushita Message-ID: <20030501134007.GC34089@madman.celabo.org> References: <200304301754.h3UHsJ21004574@repoman.freebsd.org> <20030430181603.GD84302@rot13.obsecurity.org> <20030501002206.GA30097@madman.celabo.org> <20030501105905M.matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030501105905M.matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org> X-Url: http://www.celabo.org/ User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i-ja.1 cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: ru@FreeBSD.org cc: mark@grondar.org cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: gordont@gnf.org cc: kris@obsecurity.org cc: markm@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Kerberos 5 (was Re: cvs commit: src/release ...) X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 May 2003 13:40:11 -0000 On Thu, May 01, 2003 at 10:59:05AM +0900, Makoto Matsushita wrote: > > nectar> Merging Kerberos 5 with the other crypto bits brings it down > nectar> to two, which is quite a blessing. (I really wouldn't mind > nectar> seeing base and crypto merged either.) > > It sounds that Kerberos5 is now combined into 'crypto' distribution, > but: > > nectar> 5.1-RELEASE (and probably the rest of the 5.x series) will > nectar> have Kerberos 5 in the base system. That being the case, > nectar> please, let us not have it as a seperate distribution, and let > nectar> us have it built by default. > > It sounds that Kerberos5 is now combined into 'base' distribution. > > Which is the true one? I apologize -- I was not precise with the terminology. By `base system' I meant the src/ tree ... e.g. FreeBSD itself, not (only) ports. As of _right this moment_, I believe Mark has moved all of the Kerberos bits into the `crypto' dist. That's where we want it for 5.1-RELEASE (as long as a `crypto' dist exists, anyway). Cheers, -- Jacques Vidrine . NTT/Verio SME . FreeBSD UNIX . Heimdal nectar@celabo.org . jvidrine@verio.net . nectar@freebsd.org . nectar@kth.se