From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 26 11:15:06 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 622D337B401; Sat, 26 Apr 2003 11:15:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bluejay.mail.pas.earthlink.net (bluejay.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD34843F93; Sat, 26 Apr 2003 11:15:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tlambert2@mindspring.com) Received: from pool0174.cvx40-bradley.dialup.earthlink.net ([216.244.42.174] helo=mindspring.com) by bluejay.mail.pas.earthlink.net with asmtp (SSLv3:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 3.33 #1) id 199UCW-0002gf-00; Sat, 26 Apr 2003 11:15:05 -0700 Message-ID: <3EAACC5E.C3351299@mindspring.com> Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2003 11:13:50 -0700 From: Terry Lambert X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Doug Barton References: <20030426013202.J3723@znfgre.qbhto.arg> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ELNK-Trace: b1a02af9316fbb217a47c185c03b154d40683398e744b8a4725a00e406b7611274c3dc7e384c88de3ca473d225a0f487350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c cc: acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org cc: current@freebsd.org cc: Nate Lawson Subject: Re: New ACPI diffs ready for testing X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2003 18:15:06 -0000 Doug Barton wrote: > On Fri, 25 Apr 2003, Nate Lawson wrote: > > I have prepared two versions of ACPI for testing, one from the 0228 dist > > and one from 0328. > > > > http://www.root.org/~nate/freebsd/acpi-0228.diff.gz > > http://www.root.org/~nate/freebsd/acpi-0328.diff.gz > > I just tested 0328 on my thinkpad a21e. I noticed two problems right away. > First, I couldn't get battery status at all. Second, the following > messages were scrolling by about once a second: > > ACPI-1284: *** Error: Method execution failed [\_SB_.PCI0.ISA_.EC__.AC__._PSR] (Node 0xc25c2640), AE_NOT_EXIST An Intel employee posted that this is fixed in the newest code drop, which is to be available soon. You can actually work around this by relaxing the ordering restrictions (turning the process two-pass). This is what Microsoft does for their implementation, I believe. -- Terry