Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2020 22:29:05 +0200 From: Klaus Cucinauomo <maciphone2@googlemail.com> To: Mark Millard <marklmi@yahoo.com>, Robert Crowston <crowston@protonmail.com>, freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RPi4B: modern firmware vs. Device tree loaded to 0x4000 (size 0xbe0c) [fails] vs. to 0x1f0000 (size 0xbd90) [works]? Message-ID: <B41799BF-D6AE-4867-8242-8A6A486B8C25@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: <B224EA53-E8C0-4A5C-A2CD-526D7FFF6E55@yahoo.com> References: <2B1B21CB-1A63-42CE-8917-98870C88CACE@yahoo.com> <F8DBF042-FD57-4AE3-8F98-0E36945469A9@yahoo.com> <3E9D015B-5702-4A52-9366-49E20BDDA5F4@googlemail.com> <tN5C4jzmxPmrt22GDxOfVidCT4I48oCyxVjfwxOdPAZpkQC1qBbhegOnnbkamnvGD-x81AxG5CorI1NIzfLf-91zcgOmQR0WtLrJ83PJJtI=@protonmail.com> <E07B6781-50E3-4A52-B582-F9EE81FE6743@googlemail.com> <cbC3hMQdQvaguB9vLBwvByx3_6cRzhxoJrMKL56_7RBNdwwPBudHiZpwfDEqUz2w34Ksv-fuo-5Iq-_0L_lfNdR5YEZDYudY1YGvshFl3Co=@protonmail.com> <68F95FE2-2FD7-4E7C-A671-8B45C445EF54@yahoo.com> <004BFE7F-6C71-4595-AA24-9D66D8C4E672@googlemail.com> <B224EA53-E8C0-4A5C-A2CD-526D7FFF6E55@yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Am 11.10.2020 um 22:21 schrieb Mark Millard <marklmi@yahoo.com>: >=20 > It was about why something like "device_tree_address=3D0x4000" is > needed when something like armstub8-gic.bin is in use. > ....the naming conventions involved in finding armstub*.bin'sallow the = file to be renamed in order to not be found,instead ofhaving to delete = the file. As also Rob proved in a previous post afaik, The latest rpi-FW is bootable even if the complete device_tree_address = -line is DELETED :-) Ha Ha=20 or to say : outcommented, if you like that more=E2=80=A6 K.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?B41799BF-D6AE-4867-8242-8A6A486B8C25>