Date: Tue, 20 Jul 1999 18:20:05 -0400 From: Tim Vanderhoek <vanderh@ecf.utoronto.ca> To: Andrey Zakhvatov <andy@icc.surw.chel.su> Cc: Chris Piazza <cpiazza@home.net>, ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ports/12690: New port: gperiodic-1.2.1 Message-ID: <19990720182005.B89607@mad> In-Reply-To: <199907200648.KAA07371@icc.surw.chel.su>; from Andrey Zakhvatov on Tue, Jul 20, 1999 at 10:48:39AM %2B0400 References: <19990720170219.A89852@norn.ca.eu.org> <199907200648.KAA07371@icc.surw.chel.su>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jul 20, 1999 at 10:48:39AM +0400, Andrey Zakhvatov wrote: > > I guess _any_ software have "Software Agreement" or "License" or something > else to state its legislation status. Why not about GPL license? The reasoning is that we already have enough copies of the GPL license. The obvious problem is that we don't have one standard copy. /usr/share/misc might not be bad, but I'm concerned it would cause backlash from cvs-committers, even if added to a text file that explains where it applies and doesn't apply, -- This is my .signature which gets appended to the end of my messages. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990720182005.B89607>