From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 20 11:03:39 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 925C3598 for ; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 11:03:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from toco-domains.de (mail.toco-domains.de [176.9.39.170]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 50C28CAA for ; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 11:03:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [0.0.0.0] (mail.toco-domains.de [176.9.39.170]) by toco-domains.de (Postfix) with ESMTPA id D306D1B22187; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 12:03:35 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <54BE3607.1010203@toco-domains.de> Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 12:03:35 +0100 From: Torsten Zuehlsdorff User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kurt Jaeger Subject: Re: Poudriere Timeout References: <201501190145.t0J1jKvg006268@slippy.cwsent.com> <54BCF7C9.7090502@toco-domains.de> <20150119154822.GX44537@home.opsec.eu> <54BD3203.5050809@toco-domains.de> <20150119191834.GH83169@home.opsec.eu> In-Reply-To: <20150119191834.GH83169@home.opsec.eu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 11:03:39 -0000 Hi, >>>> Yes, i have. I've solved this problem by moving the build-jails of >>>> poudriere to an memory disk. This make poudriere no longer io-bund and >>>> incredibly fast. And solve this issue ;) > >>> How did you do this ? I want to try this myself 8-} > >> I've hacked poudriere to run within a jail. > > Aha, the .m mountpoint. My test host has 32 GB, so 20 GB should not be > a problem. > > Testport: www/p5-Selenium-Remote-Driver on 10.1-amd64, 9.3-amd64 and 8.4-i386. > > Results: > > old: 00:05:43 > new: 00:05:11 I suppose the fetch has to be done? > old: 00:01:56 > new: 00:00:12 > > old: 00:02:11 > new: 00:00:14 > > Nice! You are welcome :) There are a bunch of speed-optimizations possible for poudriere, but this will defeat its general purpose. Using a memory disk is the easiest and fastest way for a big improvement. Greetings, Torsten