From owner-freebsd-current Sat Apr 10 9:34:22 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from gratis.grondar.za (gratis.grondar.za [196.7.18.65]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B26D014EB6 for ; Sat, 10 Apr 1999 09:34:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mark@grondar.za) Received: from greenpeace.grondar.za (greenpeace.grondar.za [196.7.18.132]) by gratis.grondar.za (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id SAA99470; Sat, 10 Apr 1999 18:31:59 +0200 (SAST) (envelope-from mark@grondar.za) Received: from grondar.za (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by greenpeace.grondar.za (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA82343; Sat, 10 Apr 1999 18:31:53 +0200 (SAST) (envelope-from mark@grondar.za) Message-Id: <199904101631.SAA82343@greenpeace.grondar.za> To: John Polstra Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Libraries with library dependancies In-Reply-To: Your message of " Sat, 10 Apr 1999 09:14:51 MST." References: Date: Sat, 10 Apr 1999 18:31:39 +0200 From: Mark Murray Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG John Polstra wrote: > I ran into a similar problem for static PAM. After some discussion > with Bruce, I held my nose and put this into bsd.libnames.mk: :-) I can see why you don't like that solution; I can also see why it is unavoidable. Any objections to me doing something similar with libcrypt/libmd? M -- Mark Murray Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message