Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 22:59:30 +0400 From: Andrej Zverev <az@freebsd.org> To: Bryan Drewery <bdrewery@freebsd.org> Cc: Mathieu Arnold <mat@freebsd.org>, Ryan Steinmetz <zi@freebsd.org>, "svn-ports-all@freebsd.org" <svn-ports-all@freebsd.org>, "svn-ports-head@freebsd.org" <svn-ports-head@freebsd.org>, "ports-committers@freebsd.org" <ports-committers@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r348593 - head/devel/p5-RPSL-Parser Message-ID: <CAD5bB%2BgBNM=LqMZ-BzTfiYeBZugqx_o9UWR3bziG-3V8t0Vs2w@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <53299DC1.8020103@FreeBSD.org> References: <201403182011.s2IKBQWc026673@svn.freebsd.org> <3E036119CE7A23072F60133C@atuin.in.mat.cc> <53299DC1.8020103@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Well, I don't know how it is now, but quick search showed at least this record from previous generation of ports managers and it look reasonable: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2005-July/025022.html . Maybe it even documented somewhere, but i don't know exact url. On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 5:38 PM, Bryan Drewery <bdrewery@freebsd.org> wrote: > On 3/18/2014 3:44 PM, Mathieu Arnold wrote: >> +--On 18 mars 2014 20:11:26 +0000 Ryan Steinmetz <zi@FreeBSD.org> wrote: >> | Author: zi >> | Date: Tue Mar 18 20:11:26 2014 >> | New Revision: 348593 >> | URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/348593 >> | QAT: https://qat.redports.org/buildarchive/r348593/ >> | >> | Log: >> | - Do not try to remove %%SITE_PERL%%/%%PERL_ARCH%%/auto or >> | %%SITE_PERL%%/%%PERL_ARCH%% >> >> You forgot to change the MAINTAINER back to you too. >> > > I really have no skin in this, but from my perspective this seems normal. > > There's 1983 ports in perl@ right now. Before I reset ports involving > teams I check to see how many are already in the alias. In perl's case I > would also give it to perl@. > > The lang/perl* ports were not maintained by perl@ until "r316226 | bapt > | 2013-04-22 07:40:10". So what was the purpose of the team if not to > maintain the main perl ports? > > I think this discussion should move to perl@, and as a team you should > come to a consensus and document it on your wiki. And if it is to not > have these ports maintained by perl@, the majority of them should > probably be reset to ports@. > > -- > Regards, > Bryan Drewery >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAD5bB%2BgBNM=LqMZ-BzTfiYeBZugqx_o9UWR3bziG-3V8t0Vs2w>