From owner-freebsd-current Mon Sep 30 12:40:27 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D539137B401 for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2002 12:40:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relay01.cablecom.net (relay01.cablecom.net [62.2.33.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8554F43E81 for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2002 12:40:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from hanspeter_roth@hotmail.com) Received: from smtp.swissonline.ch (mail-4.swissonline.ch [62.2.32.85]) by relay01.cablecom.net (8.12.5/8.12.5/SOL/AWF/MXRELAY/20020820) with ESMTP id g8UJeOZ2026905 for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2002 21:40:24 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from hanspeter_roth@hotmail.com) Received: from snoopy.here (dclient80-218-74-198.hispeed.ch [80.218.74.198]) by smtp.swissonline.ch (8.11.6/8.11.6/SMTPSOL/AWF/2002040101) with ESMTP id g8UJeNF16187 for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2002 21:40:24 +0200 (MEST) Received: (from hampi@localhost) by snoopy.here (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g8UJeMh00321 for freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG; Mon, 30 Sep 2002 21:40:22 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from hanspeter_roth@hotmail.com) Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 21:40:22 +0200 From: Hanspeter Roth To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Fatal trap 12 Message-ID: <20020930214022.A284@snoopy.cablecom.ch> Reply-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG References: <20020930201513.A318@snoopy.cablecom.ch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from jhb@FreeBSD.ORG on Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 03:16:17PM -0400 Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sep 30 at 15:16, John Baldwin spoke: > > Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernal mode > > fault virtual address = 0xdeadc0de > > This means someone is trying to access memory that has been free'd. How do I make someone not to do such bad things? :-) > Hmm, unfortunately generic_bcopy() is in asm, and so it doesn't have > a "true" frame and we end up skipping over the frame in execve() > where it is called from. There are only 3 bcopy's in execve(), but > I'm not sure which is likely to have been the problematic one. Did I smash upgrade? Or doesn't Current just like my hardware? -Hanspeter To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message