From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Oct 31 13:10:39 2008
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D6D5106564A
	for <freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org>;
	Fri, 31 Oct 2008 13:10:39 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from tijl@ulyssis.org)
Received: from mailrelay005.isp.belgacom.be (mailrelay005.isp.belgacom.be
	[195.238.6.171])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 148BA8FC1A
	for <freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org>;
	Fri, 31 Oct 2008 13:10:38 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from tijl@ulyssis.org)
X-Belgacom-Dynamic: yes
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AsAEALWfCklR9cmm/2dsb2JhbACBdstsg1E
Received: from 166.201-245-81.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be (HELO
	kalimero.kotnet.org) ([81.245.201.166])
	by relay.skynet.be with ESMTP; 31 Oct 2008 14:10:37 +0100
Received: from kalimero.kotnet.org (kalimero.kotnet.org [127.0.0.1])
	by kalimero.kotnet.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id m9VD864H002722;
	Fri, 31 Oct 2008 14:08:06 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from tijl@ulyssis.org)
From: Tijl Coosemans <tijl@ulyssis.org>
To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org, Roman Divacky <rdivacky@freebsd.org>
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 14:07:24 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10
References: <200810280859.24048@aldan>
	<200810302250.m9UMoHpl014714@saturn.kn-bremen.de>
	<20081031090822.GA41624@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <20081031090822.GA41624@freebsd.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200810311407.25844.tijl@ulyssis.org>
Cc: Juergen Lock <nox@jelal.kn-bremen.de>,
	Mikhail Teterin <mi+k@aldan.algebra.com>
Subject: Re: flash9 checklist (was: flash-9, 10 on FreeBSD)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems
	<freebsd-emulation.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-emulation-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-emulation>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-emulation-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-emulation-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 13:10:39 -0000

On Friday 31 October 2008 10:08:22 Roman Divacky wrote:
>>> we can expect problems in future
>>> when people dont mount linprocfs..
>>>
>>> maybe we should put some checks into linuxulator... 
>> 
>> Or if we put something in browser startup scripts it also needs to
>> be in the native ones since those can use linux flash via wrappers
>> as well.
> 
> the native ff + linuxflash uses linuxulator (ie. /compat/linux/proc) ?
> I dont think so...

Yes, it does. The wrapper plugin loaded by the browser is native, but
the actual plugin runs in a separate linuxulator process and needs
linprocfs.