From owner-freebsd-security Wed Apr 25 7: 5:58 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from softweyr.com (bsdconspiracy.net [208.187.122.220]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 115AC37B422 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2001 07:05:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from wes@softweyr.com) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=softweyr.com ident=2d30ffc1ee241b6ab4b50c9e48679bcd) by softweyr.com with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #1) id 14sPvF-00006D-00; Wed, 25 Apr 2001 08:05:37 -0600 Message-ID: <3AE6D9B1.18CC58C9@softweyr.com> Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2001 08:05:37 -0600 From: Wes Peters Organization: Softweyr LLC X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.12 i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rasputin Cc: security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IPf fragment fix References: <20010425135255.A847@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Rasputin wrote: > > This is the one that was patched in STABLE on the 7th of April, > isn't it? > > http://www.deadly.org/article.php3?sid=20010419234351 > > So we got a fix 2 weeks before OpenBSD. That's pretty impressive. > > Just wanted to check before I start ribbing my mate who > keeps gloating over the 'secure by default' mantra ;) We just happened to upgrade to .17 at "the right time". Of course, we've had .17 running on OpenBSD 2.7 and 2.8 since the day .17 was released at work. ;^) -- "Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?" Wes Peters Softweyr LLC wes@softweyr.com http://softweyr.com/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message