From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 18 08:43:25 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7783416A47A for ; Sun, 18 Jun 2006 08:43:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [207.200.4.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CE8343D6E for ; Sun, 18 Jun 2006 08:43:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 184D42D0E; Sun, 18 Jun 2006 03:43:16 -0500 (CDT) Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2006 03:43:16 -0500 To: Divacky Roman Message-ID: <20060618084316.GB10891@soaustin.net> References: <3223.1150403817@critter.freebsd.dk> <200606151259.57929.beech@alaskaparadise.com> <20060615212048.GA72318@xor.obsecurity.org> <20060616062841.GA2193@haakonia.hitnet.RWTH-Aachen.DE> <20060616084538.69fki90ri8wk8kcg@netchild.homeip.net> <20060616151931.GA42934@xor.obsecurity.org> <20060617083156.GA84611@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> <20060617084626.GA20327@xor.obsecurity.org> <20060618084016.GA44510@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060618084016.GA44510@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i From: linimon@lonesome.com (Mark Linimon) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 18 Jun 2006 11:20:24 +0000 Cc: current@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: HEADS-UP: removed COMPAT_43 from GENERIC (and other configs) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2006 08:43:25 -0000 On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 10:40:16AM +0200, Divacky Roman wrote: > well.. you can never be sure but my point stands still - COMPAT_43TTY is > basically a bunch of tty-related ioctls so I dont see why apps like (gtar > which doesnt touch tty at all) should fail.. "shouldn't" and "won't" are rarely equal in software engineering, expecially when dealing with crufty old code that probably included *.h "just in case". mcl