From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Mar 19 08:19:00 2008
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: arch@hub.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9FD41065670;
	Wed, 19 Mar 2008 08:19:00 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from davidxu@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org
	[IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C89E8FC18;
	Wed, 19 Mar 2008 08:19:00 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from davidxu@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from apple.my.domain (root@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m2J8IvS9079221;
	Wed, 19 Mar 2008 08:18:58 GMT (envelope-from davidxu@freebsd.org)
Message-ID: <47E0CCC4.8040503@freebsd.org>
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 16:20:20 +0800
From: David Xu <davidxu@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071211)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Daniel Eischen <deischen@FreeBSD.org>
References: <20080307020626.G920@desktop>
	<Pine.GSO.4.64.0803071114100.1950@sea.ntplx.net>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0803071114100.1950@sea.ntplx.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: arch@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: Getting rid of the static msleep priority boost
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture <freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 08:19:00 -0000

Daniel Eischen wrote:

> I'm not sure if any of the above remove the priority from the API,
> but it would be nice to get rid of msleep totally and replace it
> with an equivalent cv_wait().
> 

And create sleep queue in each cv to get rid of shared sleep queue
lock ?

Regards,
David Xu