Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2023 08:40:35 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 275141] [NEW PORT] x11/wlopm Message-ID: <bug-275141-7788-rrwVU409JD@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-275141-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-275141-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D275141 Robert Clausecker <fuz@FreeBSD.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tino.engel@mail.de Attachment #246384| |maintainer-approval?(tino.e Flags| |ngel@mail.de) --- Comment #18 from Robert Clausecker <fuz@FreeBSD.org> --- Created attachment 246384 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D246384&action= =3Dedit patch I plan to commit I've reviewed your patch and copy-edited it a little bit to make it confirm= to our conventions. Most importantly, I removed all the extra warning flags. We do not add ext= ra flags to the compilation unless they are needed to make the build work. Please check the result and let me know if it is ok by setting the "maintainer-approval" flag to "+" on the patch. If not, please submit a revised patch or let me know what to change. I also noticed that pkg-descr is a bit short and very technical. If you ha= ve no experience with Wayland internals, it sounds very cryptic. Perhaps you could extend it a little and explain how a user could benefit from installi= ng the port. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-275141-7788-rrwVU409JD>