From owner-freebsd-standards Tue Apr 23 8:33:36 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-standards@freebsd.org Received: from mailman.zeta.org.au (mailman.zeta.org.au [203.26.10.16]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B985637B41A; Tue, 23 Apr 2002 08:33:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bde.zeta.org.au (bde.zeta.org.au [203.2.228.102]) by mailman.zeta.org.au (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id BAA00805; Wed, 24 Apr 2002 01:33:30 +1000 Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 01:34:27 +1000 (EST) From: Bruce Evans X-X-Sender: bde@gamplex.bde.org To: "Tim J. Robbins" Cc: Mike Barcroft , Peter Avalos , Subject: Re: df -t option In-Reply-To: <20020423200510.A1738@treetop.robbins.dropbear.id.au> Message-ID: <20020424013035.A12579-100000@gamplex.bde.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, 23 Apr 2002, Tim J. Robbins wrote: > On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 08:22:57PM -0400, Mike Barcroft wrote: > > > I agree. In -stable, -T could become an alias for -t, and using -t > > instead of -T could result in a warning noting its deprecated status. > > I did something similar when I added the -p option to whois(1). > > A quick grep shows that the mount(8) and umount(8) utilities, but nothing > else, use -t to specify the filesystem type. What do you propose be done Also fsck. > with these utilities? Leaving mount/umount alone seems like the right thing > to do to me, but it may also be confusing. Leaving df -t alone seems right to me. df -t is a bit newer than mount -t though. It wasn't in FreeBSD-1. Bruce To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-standards" in the body of the message