From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Aug 25 22:15:42 2004
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 4CED116A4D7; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 22:15:42 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 39FD943D49; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 22:15:42 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from bright@elvis.mu.org)
Received: by elvis.mu.org (Postfix, from userid 1192)
	id 19FFA5C9B1; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 15:15:42 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 15:15:42 -0700
From: Alfred Perlstein <alfred@freebsd.org>
To: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org>
Message-ID: <20040825221542.GB26612@elvis.mu.org>
References: <200408252124.i7PLOaHa084709@repoman.freebsd.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200408252124.i7PLOaHa084709@repoman.freebsd.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org
cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org
cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern uipc_usrreq.c
X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree <cvs-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 22:15:42 -0000

* Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> [040825 14:24] wrote:
> rwatson     2004-08-25 21:24:36 UTC
> 
>   FreeBSD src repository
> 
>   Modified files:
>     sys/kern             uipc_usrreq.c 
>   Log:
>   Don't hold the UNIX domain socket subsystem lock over the body of the
>   UNIX domain socket garbage collection implementation, as that risks
>   holding the mutex over potentially sleeping operations (as well as
>   introducing some nasty lock order issues, etc).  unp_gc() will hold
>   the lock long enough to do necessary deferal checks and set that it's
>   running, but then release it until it needs to reset the gc state.
>   
>   RELENG_5 candidate.
>   
>   Discussed with: alfred

Which alfred? :)

-- 
- Alfred Perlstein
- Research Engineering Development Inc.
- email: bright@mu.org cell: 408-480-4684