From owner-freebsd-questions Sun May 14 4:16:42 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from lesbains.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (lesbains.Informatik.Uni-Tuebingen.De [134.2.12.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FE9C37B632 for ; Sun, 14 May 2000 04:16:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sperber@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de) Received: from informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (brabantio [134.2.12.25]) by lesbains.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C063439 for ; Sun, 14 May 2000 13:16:36 +0200 (DFT) Received: (from sperber@localhost) by informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (AIX4.3/UCB 8.8.8/8.8.8) id NAA03342; Sun, 14 May 2000 13:16:34 +0200 To: questions@freebsd.org Subject: pcm sampling rate abysmal with SoundBlaster AWE64 & 128 From: sperber@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor]) Date: 14 May 2000 13:16:33 +0200 Message-ID: Lines: 17 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0804 (Gnus v5.8.4) XEmacs/21.1 (Acadia) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi there, I'm trying to do audio recording with FreeBSD 4.0. I have a system with an SB AWE64 and another with a new SB 128. However, recording even at 44100Hz yields just terrible samples that don't sound any different from 8000Hz samples. On both systems. I've tried dap from ports as well as Sox. A cursory inspection of the Sox source code suggests that it is indeed using the SNDCTL_DSP_SPEED ioctl correctly. Is it the hardware? (On the AWE64 box, I was using OSS on 2.2.7 before which worked beautifully?) Is it me? Any help would be much appreciated. -- Cheers =8-} Mike Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message