From owner-cvs-sys Thu Feb 5 19:22:56 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from daemon@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id TAA08556 for cvs-sys-outgoing; Thu, 5 Feb 1998 19:22:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-cvs-sys) Received: from cain.gsoft.com.au (genesi.lnk.telstra.net [139.130.136.161]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id TAA08034; Thu, 5 Feb 1998 19:19:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from doconnor@cain.gsoft.com.au) Received: from cain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cain.gsoft.com.au (8.8.8/8.6.9) with ESMTP id NAA27642; Fri, 6 Feb 1998 13:48:17 +1030 (CST) Message-Id: <199802060318.NAA27642@cain.gsoft.com.au> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0zeta 7/24/97 To: Eivind Eklund cc: "Jordan K. Hubbard" , cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-sys@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/conf files In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 06 Feb 1998 04:09:48 BST." <19980206040948.49901@follo.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 06 Feb 1998 13:48:17 +1030 From: "Daniel O'Connor" Sender: owner-cvs-sys@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > There are good sides of their model, too - you have a centralized > place to throw changes at, and the person taking care of that area > have to either reject or accept - ignoring is not really an option. Whats the difference between that, and me just mailing a committer (or -current) with my groovy new patch? The central person in the Linux model could just ignore it (like what happens on -current ;) --------------------------------------------------------------------- |Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software | |http://www.gsoft.com.au | |The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to| |choose from. -- Andrew Tanenbaum | ---------------------------------------------------------------------