From owner-freebsd-current Mon Mar 27 13:51:55 1995 Return-Path: current-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id NAA10853 for current-outgoing; Mon, 27 Mar 1995 13:51:55 -0800 Received: from trout.sri.MT.net (trout.sri.MT.net [204.182.243.12]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id NAA10844 for ; Mon, 27 Mar 1995 13:51:37 -0800 Received: (from nate@localhost) by trout.sri.MT.net (8.6.9/8.6.9) id OAA03596; Mon, 27 Mar 1995 14:55:45 -0700 Date: Mon, 27 Mar 1995 14:55:45 -0700 From: Nate Williams Message-Id: <199503272155.OAA03596@trout.sri.MT.net> In-Reply-To: Poul-Henning Kamp "Re: shared library versioning" (Mar 27, 1:47pm) X-Mailer: Mail User's Shell (7.2.5 10/14/92) To: Poul-Henning Kamp Subject: Re: shared library versioning Cc: current@FreeBSD.org Sender: current-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > >> I didn't see a bump, but as a result of this change, it should be. > > > > > >So instead of said binaries failing catastrophically on a link > > >error, they just fail to find the library in question and fail > > >catastrophically on a missing library? > > > > No, ld.so looks for the highest rev library with the same major number. > > "higher than or equal to" what they are linked against that is... > > see my other msg. See my other mesg. :-) Nate