From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Apr 27 13: 4:30 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mailf.telia.com (mailf.telia.com [194.22.194.25]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 032F937B818 for ; Thu, 27 Apr 2000 13:04:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from james.wilde@telia.com) Received: from tbvhks12 (t5o72p1.telia.com [212.181.217.1]) by mailf.telia.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id WAA15912; Thu, 27 Apr 2000 22:04:06 +0200 (CEST) From: "James A Wilde" To: Cc: "FreeBSD Questions" Subject: RE: named exited on signal 11 Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2000 22:05:22 +0200 Message-ID: <000001bfb083$eb691500$8c0aa8c0@hk.tbv.se> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2377.0 In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Importance: Normal Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Thanks Andrew. I can understand that a kernel compile could have a regular exit on signal 11, but in a production machine with several programs running I would have expected a little more random choice of program that exits. What is there about named that is likely to cause just such a problem regularly? OTOH my colleague in another part of the country reports that he had a machine in which named exited with signal 11 until they increased the memory in the machine. Is named such a memory hogger? mvh/regards James To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message