From owner-freebsd-security Wed Sep 8 1: 4: 6 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from guppy.pond.net (guppy.pond.net [205.240.25.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FDFA15084 for ; Wed, 8 Sep 1999 01:04:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dmp@aracnet.com) Received: from aracnet.com (snapuser2-89.pacificcrest.net [216.36.34.89]) by guppy.pond.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id BAA11486; Wed, 8 Sep 1999 01:00:38 -0700 (PDT) From: dmp@aracnet.com Message-ID: <37D61842.663D324A@aracnet.com> Date: Wed, 08 Sep 1999 01:03:14 -0700 X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.6 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: grub Cc: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Layer 2 ethernet encryption? References: <37D4CA23.6A64FCAC@aracnet.com> <37D38AB0.D4871A@grub.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org grub wrote: > dmp@aracnet.com wrote: > > In order: > > > > A machine on the network can't see any other machine other that it's > > firewall interface until the DC authorizes it's presence. > > > > Managed switches aren't used, we haven't found one that can provide > > a high enough level of security. > > > > The server rooms already are locked. > > This is an interesting thread but I have a solution: "Sneaker Net" :) We found that most of us would require unhealthy amounts of anabolic steroids and intense weight training to achieve sufficient bandwidth. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message