Date: Sun, 08 Jun 2003 21:21:29 -0600 From: Scott Long <scottl@freebsd.org> To: Rong-en Fan <rafan@infor.org> Cc: hubs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: It's time for 5.1-R bits Message-ID: <3EE3FD39.3020308@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20030609023437.GA25227@muse.csie.ntu.edu.tw> References: <3EDF7E79.3000501@freebsd.org> <7mn0gw9ni0.wl@black.imgsrc.co.jp> <3EDFE735.30604@freebsd.org> <3EE04C63.30203@freebsd.org> <20030606084536.GA85259@terry.dragon2.net> <20030609023437.GA25227@muse.csie.ntu.edu.tw>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Rong-en Fan wrote: > On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 04:45:36PM +0800, Ying-Chieh Liao wrote: > >>On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 02:10:11 -0600, Scott Long wrote: >> >>>i386 and pc98 iso and ftp bits are up with the restricted permissions. >> >>i386/5.1 and pc98/5.1-RELEASE ? >> >>why not all use 5.1 or all use 5.1-RELEASE ? > > > I've noticed that pc98 & ia64 have ISO-IMAGES/5.1-RELEASE > while others have ISO-IMAGES/5.1. > > Could we unify these names? > I'm ll in favor of unifying the names. There is concern that changing the names on the directories will cause the directory contents to be re-rsynced, however. Can some other mirror operators comment on this? With less than 11 hours before we announce, I hate to upset things. Scott
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3EE3FD39.3020308>