From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu May  1 15:43:45 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C26E937B401
	for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Thu,  1 May 2003 15:43:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fafoe.dyndns.org (chello212186121237.14.vie.surfer.at
	[212.186.121.237])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22EA743F93
	for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Thu,  1 May 2003 15:43:42 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from stefan@fafoe.dyndns.org)
Received: from wombat.fafoe (wombat.fafoe [192.168.2.102])
	by fafoe.dyndns.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 4034A3FC4; Fri,  2 May 2003 00:43:39 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by wombat.fafoe (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id 089CED1; Fri,  2 May 2003 00:43:34 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Fri, 2 May 2003 00:43:34 +0200
From: Stefan Farfeleder <stefan@fafoe.dyndns.org>
To: Bakul Shah <bakul@bitblocks.com>
Message-ID: <20030501224334.GD546@wombat.fafoe>
Mail-Followup-To: Bakul Shah <bakul@bitblocks.com>,
	hackers@freebsd.org
References: <20030501221631.GB546@wombat.fafoe>
	<200305012231.h41MVePF062201@bitblocks.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200305012231.h41MVePF062201@bitblocks.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
cc: hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: incorrect enum warning?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
	<freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 May 2003 22:43:46 -0000

On Thu, May 01, 2003 at 03:31:40PM -0700, Bakul Shah wrote:

> \begin{nitpicking}
> 0x80000000 is *not* an unsigned int, just a regular signed
> int but outside the legal range.

It is and I quoted the relevant section of ISO/IEC 9899:1999 in this
thread.

Stefan Farfeleder