From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 12 11:01:05 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7B0316A4CE for ; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 11:01:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from postal2.es.net (postal2.es.net [198.128.3.206]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C8D543D1F for ; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 11:01:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from oberman@es.net) Received: from ptavv.es.net ([198.128.4.29]) by postal2.es.net (Postal Node 2) with ESMTP (SSL) id IBA74465; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 11:01:05 -0800 Received: from ptavv (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ptavv.es.net (Tachyon Server) with ESMTP id CE6E75D04; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 11:01:04 -0800 (PST) To: anton@nikiforov.ru In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 12 Mar 2004 21:57:07 +0300." <40520803.205@nikiforov.ru> Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 11:01:04 -0800 From: "Kevin Oberman" Message-Id: <20040312190104.CE6E75D04@ptavv.es.net> cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ATAPICAM problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 19:01:05 -0000 > Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 21:57:07 +0300 > From: Anton Nikiforov > Sender: owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org > > This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format. > > --------------ms060909070201090803040608 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > Roman Neuhauser ?????: > > ># anton@nikiforov.ru / 2004-03-12 21:42:00 +0300: > > > > > >>Could someone please help with running atapicam on ompaq Presario 2585 > >>under -CURRENT? > >>I did install device atapicam into the kernel and was not succseed. > >> > >> > > > > which means? cut+paste the buildkernel error message. > > > > > Which means what? Sorry for my english. > in the kernel configuration file i have put a line > device atapicam > And the kernel was built and installed without visible problems. > There was no messages (dmesg, /var/log/*, anywhere) about adding cd0. > But under -STABLE it is just installing a cd0 like (1,0,0 in SCSI terms) And what did you want it to do? It is expected to create /dev/cd0 and, unless you do something to invoke devfs, that's about all you should expect. Have you tried using /dev/cd0? Does it work or fail? /dev/cd0c is no longer used in V5. -- R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer Energy Sciences Network (ESnet) Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) E-mail: oberman@es.net Phone: +1 510 486-8634