From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 15 08:30:10 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E657C37A for ; Tue, 15 Jul 2014 08:30:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-oa0-x233.google.com (mail-oa0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c02::233]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B23002B18 for ; Tue, 15 Jul 2014 08:30:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oa0-f51.google.com with SMTP id o6so3631788oag.10 for ; Tue, 15 Jul 2014 01:30:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=gUuFVwoJOjmuWWREYu4VO0j0kIsxeSHp2Mrn/pPTqMU=; b=yIZYeF1vWsMkIq93VYGUhHwFrohRH6yz5y4RuhVwtmLOobwM+bd/ZPJARP4DzZPydf uNilai4lgmtcLMWHlW+fM8hj6ce9mkUrMvCauqUoHqkTO5nuF+ulceT7yQUWgXN98dub crGfYc7xhBAmtTslm6p36ZXBpu5PinI41lFfQ+WVQclZTds7BMcQOuBiBuHy4URJuyRt TUve9s1GIAa9KMbV0qTo1a+ilKGB1RMIHKgI1TesJgtN7CAjIIlvIIQy5eh2Obqi+Thx Fiwz+iRwx/TvBe7gRDiJuVg+JUuVr1nqU7Nk41ekP8fupkTwdNz853MxqBJTea0CRA1Y K41w== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.102.197 with SMTP id fq5mr23073476obb.3.1405413010053; Tue, 15 Jul 2014 01:30:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.182.216.197 with HTTP; Tue, 15 Jul 2014 01:30:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2014 10:30:09 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: libdevattr From: Oliver Pinter To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Bruno_Lauz=E9?= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: "freebsd-current@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2014 08:30:11 -0000 On 7/15/14, Bruno Lauz=E9 wrote: > I was looking at dragonfly and why they have libdevattr and we don'tI rea= lly > think having udev compatible api would open the door to a lot of software= , > imho.I feel it wouldn't be so complicated to port dragonfly kern_udev, > libprop and libdevattr from dragonfly bsd. > Am i missing a point or is this in contradiction witch any of freebsd > objectives? > Let me know your thoughts... =09 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org= " > In FreeBSD exists similar utility like udev, the so called devd. In github is there a project, which would improve the compatibility or completely change the udev like brain-damage. https://github.com/freebsd/libdevq Other problem with udev is, that moving so fast, and every time changed their API, and udev's future are not clear, possibly merged with systemd.