From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 12 17:43:23 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30B5116A4CE for ; Sun, 12 Sep 2004 17:43:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from tethys.ringofsaturn.com (tethys.ringofsaturn.com [66.13.175.242]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5AC343D2D for ; Sun, 12 Sep 2004 17:43:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rnejdl@ringofsaturn.com) Received: from mail.ringofsaturn.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) i8CHhKe5036569; Sun, 12 Sep 2004 12:43:20 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from rnejdl@ringofsaturn.com) Received: from 66.13.175.242 (SquirrelMail authenticated user rnejdl); by mail.ringofsaturn.com with HTTP; Sun, 12 Sep 2004 12:43:20 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <59222.66.13.175.242.1095011000.squirrel@mail.ringofsaturn.com> In-Reply-To: <4144891F.2070308@elischer.org> References: <1131.66.13.175.243.1094958979.squirrel@mail.ringofsaturn.com> <20040912051028.GA74510@hub.freebsd.org> <62869.66.13.175.242.1094996122.squirrel@mail.ringofsaturn.com> <4144891F.2070308@elischer.org> Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2004 12:43:20 -0500 (CDT) From: "Rusty Nejdl" To: "Julian Elischer" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.5.1 [CVS] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version 0.75.1, clamav-milter version 0.75c on tethys.ringofsaturn.com X-Virus-Status: Clean cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Freeze up on Beta-4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: rnejdl@ringofsaturn.com List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2004 17:43:23 -0000 >> >> This does indeed work. However, I wasn't having problems with ULE >> until some change was committed in the last week caused this problem for >> me. The only significant breakage I found so far with ULE was when I had >> hyperthreading enabled. > > We aren't saying that we won't fix ULE.. just that to get you going > we suggest 4BSD for now and we'll get back to ULE when we figure it out > :-) > > Julian and Kris, Thanks! I was just trying to help narrow down something that was introduced that caused problems. I'm using 4BSD now and all is good. Rusty