From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 16 06:44:45 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D565216A41F for ; Fri, 16 Feb 2007 06:44:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ale@FreeBSD.org) Received: from lab.alexdupre.com (lab.alexdupre.com [81.174.31.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 204AE13C428 for ; Fri, 16 Feb 2007 06:44:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ale@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 95786 invoked from network); 16 Feb 2007 06:44:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.178.2?) (192.168.178.2) by lab.alexdupre.com with SMTP; 16 Feb 2007 06:44:43 -0000 Message-ID: <45D552DB.5060006@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 07:44:43 +0100 From: Alex Dupre User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20070119) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kris Kennaway References: <200702141652.l1EGqeZV047261@repoman.freebsd.org> <20070215095351.GA34667@FreeBSD.org> <45D4337A.8080302@FreeBSD.org> <20070215185941.GA42443@xor.obsecurity.org> <45D4D6A9.4060600@FreeBSD.org> <20070215222111.GA45309@xor.obsecurity.org> <45D54EF3.7000103@FreeBSD.org> <20070216063141.GA49995@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20070216063141.GA49995@xor.obsecurity.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/devel Makefile ports/devel/Subversive Makefile distinfo pkg-descr X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 06:44:45 -0000 Kris Kennaway wrote: > The statement there is that it gets an exception because it's a > meta-port...although you're right that it doesn't really make sense > and we should probably remove that text. Absolutely, I will do it. > As mentioned no repo-copy is needed here since it's a newly added port > with no history. Yes, but I was speaking more generally. -- Alex Dupre