Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 30 Jan 2020 17:28:24 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 243735] devel/glib20: unravel SSP_CFLAGS workaround for qemu-user-static
Message-ID:  <bug-243735-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D243735

            Bug ID: 243735
           Summary: devel/glib20: unravel SSP_CFLAGS workaround for
                    qemu-user-static
           Product: Ports & Packages
           Version: Latest
          Hardware: Any
                OS: Any
            Status: New
          Severity: Affects Only Me
          Priority: ---
         Component: Individual Port(s)
          Assignee: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
          Reporter: kevans@freebsd.org

Created attachment 211199
  --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D211199&action=
=3Dedit
svn(1) diff against the ports tree

This patch includes unwinding of SSP_CFLAGS for devel/glib20,
emulators/qemu-sbruno, emulators/qemu-user-static-devel -- the latter two a=
re
"Approved by: emulation (maintainer, kevans)"

- devel/glib20 SSP_CFLAGS were added in r500819.
- emulators/qemu-sbruno SSP_CFLAGS were added in r501032.

Both of these were added to workaround what turned out to be imprecise orde=
ring
in libc, which is now fixed in all supported releases as of 11.3-p6, 12.0-p=
13,
12.1-p2. This patch may need to be delayed slightly to make sure the package
builders have caught up to the appropriate patchlevel to ensure we don't en=
d up
with broken packages, but I'm told this happens frequently.

Anyone building their own ports will need to ensure they're building agains=
t a
base of the appropriate patchlevels.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-243735-7788>