From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 9 13:51:41 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E5FB16A41C for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 13:51:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from kane.otenet.gr (kane.otenet.gr [195.170.0.95]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D851E43D1D for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 13:51:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from orion.daedalusnetworks.priv (aris.bedc.ondsl.gr [62.103.39.226]) by kane.otenet.gr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-1) with SMTP id j59DpOgI000935; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 16:51:25 +0300 Received: from orion.daedalusnetworks.priv (orion [127.0.0.1]) by orion.daedalusnetworks.priv (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j59DpOJt067609; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 16:51:24 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from keramida@localhost) by orion.daedalusnetworks.priv (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j59DpO5n067608; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 16:51:24 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 16:51:24 +0300 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Bart Silverstrim Message-ID: <20050609135124.GA67573@orion.daedalusnetworks.priv> References: <200506091145.j59BjAO6028202@clunix.cl.msu.edu> <200506090739.57892.lane@joeandlane.com> <5341204f22db0c3969e6d161e2fa5b0f@chrononomicon.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5341204f22db0c3969e6d161e2fa5b0f@chrononomicon.com> Cc: Lane , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Very Dissapointed X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2005 13:51:41 -0000 On 2005-06-09 08:59, Bart Silverstrim wrote: >On Jun 9, 2005, at 8:39 AM, Lane wrote: >> I don't know the concept "transparent proxy." Hopefully you will >> discover how that works as you build your firewall :) > > I think a transparent proxy is a proxy that your users didn't know > they were going through...their machines use it without any manual > configuration to point to it, and usually they don't have a choice. Bridging may also help a lot there. A machine that sits between two networks and acts as a bridge can still filter traffic with IPFW, but it has no IP address, so it's effectively "invisible" to the two sides of the network.