From owner-freebsd-arch Fri Jun 14 0:26:11 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from axl.seasidesoftware.co.za (axl.seasidesoftware.co.za [196.31.7.201]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD3FA37B415; Fri, 14 Jun 2002 00:26:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sheldonh (helo=axl.seasidesoftware.co.za) by axl.seasidesoftware.co.za with local-esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1) id 17IlTr-0007KA-00; Fri, 14 Jun 2002 09:26:47 +0200 From: Sheldon Hearn To: Juli Mallett Cc: arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: The Source Code Control System In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 13 Jun 2002 16:38:18 MST." <20020613163818.A61161@FreeBSD.ORG> Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2002 09:26:47 +0200 Message-ID: <28157.1024039607@axl.seasidesoftware.co.za> Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, 13 Jun 2002 16:38:18 MST, Juli Mallett wrote: > > I think it's reasonable that the work can be done in the FreeBSD repo. > > If it's later deemed necessary to move the software into the ports tree, > > the work done will not have been done in vain, nor will its having been > > done in the FreeBSD repo be of any concern. > > I have CVS files for it on freefall, I'm thinking maybe I should ask for them > to be surgically implanted into projects/sccs ? > > That way I can try to drag all of you other committers into working on it, and > so on. > > Does this sound reasonable? I guess. I actually thought you'd be doing this in src itself, since that's where sccs is already. But I think this is one of those things where you can't lose either way. If you go the projects/sccs route and you started with what's in src/usr.bin/sccs, just make sure what goes in projects/sccs preserves CVS history. Ciao, Sheldon. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message