From owner-freebsd-current Sat Apr 10 9:41:38 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from wall.polstra.com (rtrwan160.accessone.com [206.213.115.74]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59FDD14EB6 for ; Sat, 10 Apr 1999 09:41:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jdp@polstra.com) Received: from vashon.polstra.com (vashon.polstra.com [206.213.73.13]) by wall.polstra.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id JAA28468; Sat, 10 Apr 1999 09:39:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jdp@polstra.com) Received: (from jdp@localhost) by vashon.polstra.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) id JAA34355; Sat, 10 Apr 1999 09:39:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jdp@polstra.com) Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.3 [p0] on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <199904101631.SAA82343@greenpeace.grondar.za> Date: Sat, 10 Apr 1999 09:39:22 -0700 (PDT) Organization: Polstra & Co., Inc. From: John Polstra To: Mark Murray Subject: Re: Libraries with library dependancies Cc: current@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Mark Murray wrote: > John Polstra wrote: >> I ran into a similar problem for static PAM. After some discussion >> with Bruce, I held my nose and put this into bsd.libnames.mk: > >:-) I can see why you don't like that solution; I can also see why > it is unavoidable. > > Any objections to me doing something similar with libcrypt/libmd? I can't very well object, can I? :-) If it's necessary, then do it. Please fix the definitions of LIBPAM and MINUSLPAM then, to remove the newly-redundant mentions of libmd. John --- John Polstra jdp@polstra.com John D. Polstra & Co., Inc. Seattle, Washington USA "Self-interest is the aphrodisiac of belief." -- James V. DeLong To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message