Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 08:48:33 -0700 From: Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD installers and future direction Message-ID: <51A38051.8040909@mu.org> In-Reply-To: <13CA24D6AB415D428143D44749F57D7201F5B337@ltcfiswmsgmb26> References: <51A0DC3F.9030301@cran.org.uk> <CAK6u07WDZrWU4dnrBzQGYf%2BpbmibK7KxSUZyvie8jJQ1SMODuw@mail.gmail.com> <51A1025A.2020607@cran.org.uk> <51A14445.4060305@freebsd.org> <51A15EDF.6050600@erdgeist.org> <CA%2BWntOtrgkstTOamTZh9_FvATd8a55ca9hCUFF1sE=2zSd4EQA@mail.gmail.com> <13CA24D6AB415D428143D44749F57D7201F5B337@ltcfiswmsgmb26>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 5/25/13 8:45 PM, Teske, Devin wrote: > On May 25, 2013, at 7:51 PM, Super Bisquit wrote: > >> Please don't turn this into an architecture dependent mess. PCBSD is i386 & >> AMD64 only. >> > There's a GSoC project (of which I'm potential mentor) to fix that. > > However, you are entirely right… we can't in all seriousness even think about using pc-sysinstall until it is solid on all architectures as bsdinstall already is. > > GSoC project is: "Making pc-sysinstall FreeBSD ready by porting it to multiple architectures" Why can we not use in the interim use pc-sysinstall on the platforms that it performs best on and use bsdinstall on the others? It doesn't make sense for us to hold up some platform like this at all. Maybe no one has thought of this? Basically use pc-sysinstall on amd64 and i386 and use bsdinstall on the other platforms until they catch up? -Alfred
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?51A38051.8040909>