From owner-svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 7 17:20:40 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A2CDAB5; Sat, 7 Sep 2013 17:20:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from smtp.des.no (smtp.des.no [194.63.250.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A2962B04; Sat, 7 Sep 2013 17:20:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nine.des.no (smtp.des.no [194.63.250.102]) by smtp-int.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CF314AA4; Sat, 7 Sep 2013 17:20:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by nine.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 5CC0529278; Sat, 7 Sep 2013 19:20:12 +0200 (CEST) From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= To: Mark R V Murray Subject: Re: svn commit: r255362 - in head: share/examples/kld share/examples/kld/random_adaptor sys/conf sys/dev/glxsb sys/dev/hifn sys/dev/random sys/dev/rndtest sys/dev/safe sys/dev/ubsec sys/kern sys/mips/c... References: <201309071415.r87EFDMv025499@svn.freebsd.org> <86ob84inzz.fsf@nine.des.no> <85C6EE50-4578-4FD3-B6D2-1B147F116F1D@grondar.org> Date: Sat, 07 Sep 2013 19:20:12 +0200 In-Reply-To: <85C6EE50-4578-4FD3-B6D2-1B147F116F1D@grondar.org> (Mark R. V. Murray's message of "Sat, 7 Sep 2013 18:16:56 +0100") Message-ID: <86fvtgim5v.fsf@nine.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, Mark Murray X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Sep 2013 17:20:40 -0000 Mark R V Murray writes: > Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav writes: > > Umm, this should have been submitted to secteam@ for review. > I made the presumption that since we had discussed it in person that > this would be OK, so my fault. We discussed the outline, but we still need to review the details. > I'd prefer not to churn by backing out, but will do so if needed. I'm reviewing the patch as we speak. I haven't yet seen anything that would justify reverting the commit, but the mips breakage Glen mentioned needs to be fixed. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no