From owner-freebsd-www@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 11 11:51:37 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-www@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-www@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7476916A42C for ; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 11:51:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danchev@spnet.net) Received: from mail.data.bg (mail.data.bg [195.149.248.177]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 83B5E43D69 for ; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 11:51:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danchev@spnet.net) Received: (qmail 16202 invoked by uid 104); 11 Oct 2005 11:51:34 -0000 Received: from danchev@spnet.net by mail by uid 104 with qmail-scanner-1.16 (spamassassin: 2.20. uvscan: v4.1.40/v4100. Clear:SA:0(-2.5/8.0):AWL, BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.0.3. Processed in 1.381283 secs); 11 Oct 2005 11:51:34 -0000 X-Spam-Tag-Score: SA:0(-2.5/8.0):AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.0.3 X-Spamassassin-Hits: -2.5 X-Spamassassin-Tests: AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.0.3 Received: from unknown (HELO danchev5.ddns.homelan.bg) (83.97.29.91) by smtp.data.bg with SMTP; 11 Oct 2005 11:51:33 -0000 From: George Danchev To: freebsd-www@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 14:51:27 +0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: <20051010102511.GC2617@flame.pc> <200510111038.30921.danchev@spnet.net> <20051011080551.GV99170@submonkey.net> In-Reply-To: <20051011080551.GV99170@submonkey.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1251" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200510111451.29515.danchev@spnet.net> Subject: Re: CSS 1.X vs. 2.X attributes X-BeenThere: freebsd-www@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD Project Webmasters List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 11:51:37 -0000 On Tuesday 11 October 2005 11:05, Ceri Davies wrote: --cut-- > > > > What is our current policy (assuming we actually _have_ one) about > > > > using CSS 1.X vs. 2.X attributes in stylesheets for the web site? > > > > > > I think it's probably OK. They'll just get ignored by browsers that > > > don't understand them, and the alternative in this instance is to not > > > include it any way as I understand it. > > > > Please don't go for such experiments. It will open another can of worms, > > e.g. inter-browser inconsistencies thus different look'n feel. > > I have personally decided that browsers that don't conform to standards > don't matter to me any more; once they stop working on 50% of the web, > they might get fixed. I guess the FreeBSD Project might need to bend to > them. Grrr, doesn't stand this way. There is a great direffence between breaking standards (which is obviously not the case here) and not using or forcing those of them which are not supported widely yet among various clients. Also this is not the last resort option of yours, thus more challenges taken is an overkill. It is just an opinion of mine, it's up to you to. -- pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB 2003-03-18 fingerprint 1AE7 7C66 0A26 5BFF DF22 5D55 1C57 0C89 0E4B D0AB