From owner-freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jul 14 11:07:31 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 997D916A4CE; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 11:07:31 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from fillmore.dyndns.org (port-212-202-50-15.dynamic.qsc.de
	[212.202.50.15])	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 1FB7243D2D; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 11:07:31 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com)
Received: from dhcp-5.local ([172.16.0.5] helo=dhcp-14.local)
	by fillmore.dyndns.org with esmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168)
	(Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD))
	id 1Bkhbj-00069d-7f; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 13:07:30 +0200
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 13:08:13 +0200
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v482)
Message-Id: <19240580-D586-11D8-A6C6-00039312D914@fillmore-labs.com>
In-Reply-To: <20040713140354.GA1695@rogue.acs-et.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
From: Oliver Eikemeier <eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: Mike Makonnen <mtm@identd.net>
User-Agent: KMail/1.5.9
cc: ports@FreeBSD.org
cc: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: localpkg script changes
X-BeenThere: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
Reply-To: ports@FreeBSD.org
List-Id: Discussion related to /etc/rc.d design and implementation.
	<freebsd-rc.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-rc>,
	<mailto:freebsd-rc-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-rc>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-rc@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-rc-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-rc>,
	<mailto:freebsd-rc-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 11:07:31 -0000

Mike Makonnen wrote:

> Hi folks,
>
> I was looking at integrating ports rc.d scripts a bit better, and the 
> following is
> what I came up with. I would appreciate reviews, tests, etc..
[...]
> Ports related rc.d cleanups:
> [...]
> o The rc.d ports scripts should now behave more like base system 
> scripts.
>   Scripts ending in .sh will be sourced into the current shell, while 
> the
>   rest will be executed in a subshell. Previously, all ports scripts,
>   regardless of the .sh suffix, were executed in a subshell.

You can't do this, since it might break too many ports. See PR 56736 for 
an alternate approach.

Follow-up to ports@, where this discussion belongs to. See
   
<http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040713140354.GA1695@rogue.acs-
et.com>
for the original message.

-Oliver