From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 30 02:59:44 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11F2C16A4DA; Wed, 30 Aug 2006 02:59:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from conrads@cox.net) Received: from eastrmmtao04.cox.net (eastrmmtao04.cox.net [68.230.240.35]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B92543D45; Wed, 30 Aug 2006 02:59:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from conrads@cox.net) Received: from eastrmimpo02.cox.net ([68.1.16.120]) by eastrmmtao04.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.06.01 201-2131-130-101-20060113) with ESMTP id <20060830025942.BVAY25210.eastrmmtao04.cox.net@eastrmimpo02.cox.net>; Tue, 29 Aug 2006 22:59:42 -0400 Received: from serene.no-ip.org ([72.200.25.154]) by eastrmimpo02.cox.net with bizsmtp id G2zd1V00B3KVMNG0000000 Tue, 29 Aug 2006 22:59:38 -0400 Received: from serene.no-ip.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by serene.no-ip.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id k7U2xfrY056902; Tue, 29 Aug 2006 21:59:41 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from conrads@cox.net) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 21:59:36 -0500 From: "Conrad J. Sabatier" To: Steve Kargl Message-ID: <20060829215936.36b1d8f1@serene.no-ip.org> In-Reply-To: <20060830023336.GA56931@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <20060826212120.GA66604@freefall.freebsd.org> <20060829175022.1a3ac0f6@serene.no-ip.org> <20060829230447.GA59838@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20060829202916.04dc8cd1@serene.no-ip.org> <20060830023336.GA56931@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Organization: A Rag-Tag Band of Drug-Crazed Hippies X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.4.0 (GTK+ 2.8.20; amd64-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Alexander Kabaev , current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP: GCC 3.4.6 update in progress X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 02:59:44 -0000 On Tue, 29 Aug 2006 19:33:36 -0700, Steve Kargl wrote: > On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 08:29:16PM -0500, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote: > > On Tue, 29 Aug 2006 16:04:47 -0700, Steve Kargl > > wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 05:50:22PM -0500, Conrad J. Sabatier > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Incidentally, I've been wondering for the longest time now: > > > > is/are there any particular reason(s) why we exclude gcj from > > > > the gcc tree/build? Sure would be a cool thing to have. > > > > > > > > > > 1) It's not needed to build anything in the base system. > > > 2) It takes a long time to build. > > > 3) You really want to use the gcc41 or gcc42 port. > > > > > > Of course, IMHO. > > > > I've tried both ports, but gcj fails to run, complaining about a > > missing "spec" file (I forget the exact filename, maybe > > "gcjlib.spec" or something similar). :-( > > > > Is this maybe an arch-specific (amd64) problem? Or? > > > > Contact Gerald. He is fairly quick at addressing port > issues. I don't build the ports because I build GCC > svn sources for 4.1.x and trunk several times a week. > I'll note that I don't normally build gjc. I can try > a bootstrap tomorrow. OK, will do. Thanks. -- Conrad J. Sabatier -- "In Unix veritas"