From nobody Sat Dec 14 05:29:41 2024 X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Y9FC169QPz5gjbt for ; Sat, 14 Dec 2024 05:29:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rrsum@summerhill.org) Received: from chance.summerhill.org (home.summerhill.org [138.43.95.123]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "chance", Issuer "chance" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Y9FC111znz43t5 for ; Sat, 14 Dec 2024 05:29:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rrsum@summerhill.org) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=summerhill.org header.s=home header.b=Idnn9Hf5; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of rrsum@summerhill.org designates 138.43.95.123 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=rrsum@summerhill.org; dmarc=pass (policy=reject) header.from=summerhill.org Received-SPF: pass (chance.summerhill.org: authenticated connection) receiver=chance.summerhill.org; client-ip=192.168.1.106; helo=[192.168.1.106]; envelope-from=rrsum@summerhill.org; x-software=spfmilter 2.001 http://www.acme.com/software/spfmilter/ with libspf2-1.2.11; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=summerhill.org; s=home; t=1734154181; bh=zLntsGcGXNsiPJQ7IbxRkCfYxMvkPDX/Zv66/mPNjko=; h=Date:To:From:Subject; b=Idnn9Hf5e8gim66fEhPMSHnv7cCCHz3zsJ/f1UZd4jCuedX8NKvBcknND8PCEIlvU b0d/SZYxdTELh6eI+2k7q0+YbIq1gSw5g7p1qdq53mdIMA60Q8m7qagkNrMcf/owpK 0cn8UkZfMbNUZX6LvnNsUE1GLxqgHDxHddc3CHv2+ttSE5zBTETgWNSp2dIcc3ATQ+ U6iKIxkBsQsSTRGOSsdkywGICR7cGvXdThsOaj4nypqBtkoKBHiMVa2p1V9C0XT520 8Z9DizBDiauOmQbdLhDZeVcs4x7OvNutkTbo+zzdFcjWpTTjFcMk/fsek1y5KnWh7L FCowToS+zkbBw== Received: from [192.168.1.106] (uby-w.summerhill.org [192.168.1.106]) (authenticated bits=0) by chance.summerhill.org (8.18.1/8.18.1) with ESMTPSA id 4BE5TfgZ036383 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 14 Dec 2024 00:29:41 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from rrsum@summerhill.org) X-Authentication-Warning: chance.summerhill.org: Host uby-w.summerhill.org [192.168.1.106] claimed to be [192.168.1.106] Message-ID: <0c3f8c87-ad8b-4d99-9d82-56d548ec641e@summerhill.org> Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2024 00:29:41 -0500 List-Id: User questions List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-questions List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Content-Language: en-US To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Rick Summerhill Subject: zfs question Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.89 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[summerhill.org,reject]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[summerhill.org:s=home]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; ONCE_RECEIVED(0.10)[]; XM_UA_NO_VERSION(0.01)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; RCVD_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; ASN(0.00)[asn:46293, ipnet:138.43.64.0/19, country:US]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; HAS_XAW(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[summerhill.org:+] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Y9FC111znz43t5 X-Spamd-Bar: --- I have a simple question about zfs.  I have a 4x4T zfs raidz1 array that has worked perfectly for years.  Recently, a disk in the array went bad, so I replaced it with a spare 8T drive that I had on hand.  My understanding is that that the array would only use 4T of that drive, and moreover, that would be true even if I had to replace two more drives with 8T disks.  However, if I replaced the last drive with an 8T disk, so all the disks were now 8T, would the array use all the of the 8T on each of the drives, or still be a 4x4T array? -- Rick