Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 29 May 1998 11:36:58 -0700 (PDT)
From:      Doug White <dwhite@gdi.uoregon.edu>
To:        Frank Pawlak <fpawlak@execpc.com>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: RTFM
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.3.96.980529112757.297N-100000@gdi.uoregon.edu>
In-Reply-To: <980528041610.ZM1327@darkstar.connect.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 28 May 1998, Frank Pawlak wrote:

> Can anyone tell me where I can locate some accurate and current information
> describing why FreeBSD can carry heavier server loads than Linux? 

Well, I can spew features.  I'd be tempted to run a comparison myself, if
I had a good hit simulator :)  A good look at the system in action is
ftp.cdrom.com.

FreeBSD's main features:
.  4.4BSD's well tested TCP/IP implementation -- it _is_ the reference
   after all
.  Robusticity to low memory & disk space conditions
.  High quality, well designed, finely tuned VM system
.  Merged VM/buffer cache balances disk I/O caching with memory needs
.  System maintains interactive response even under heavy load
.  Scheduler scales well as process demand increases
.  Default setup of system daemons encourages good security

Doug White                              | University of Oregon  
Internet:  dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu    | Residence Networking Assistant
http://gladstone.uoregon.edu/~dwhite    | Computer Science Major



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.980529112757.297N-100000>