Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 18 Sep 1997 17:35:33 -0500 (EST)
From:      "John S. Dyson" <toor@dyson.iquest.net>
To:        current@freebsd.org
Subject:   FYI: regarding our rfork(2)
Message-ID:  <199709182235.RAA09701@dyson.iquest.net>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I am going to be changing our rfork implementation in the following ways:

	Rename RFMEM to RFSHMEM, implying that we are fully sharing memory.
	Also implying that we don't support RFMEM in the same way as other
	OSes might.  Add an additional argument to rfork(2) to support
	specifying a new stack address in the child.  This argument is
	meaningful only if RFSHMEM is specified.  This mod will eliminate
	some potential timing windows when the child is running with the
	parents stack.  It will also eliminate the need for certain
	"gymnastics" in code that uses rfork with RFSHMEM.

	I'll be committing the changes tonight, so let me know if anyone
	has problems with the concept.

-- 
John
dyson@freebsd.org
jdyson@nc.com



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199709182235.RAA09701>