From owner-freebsd-ports  Fri May  9 16:34:20 1997
Return-Path: <owner-ports>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id QAA05829
          for ports-outgoing; Fri, 9 May 1997 16:34:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vader.cs.berkeley.edu (vader.CS.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.38.234])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id QAA05823
          for <ports@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri, 9 May 1997 16:34:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from asami@localhost) by vader.cs.berkeley.edu (8.8.5/8.7.3) id QAA10124; Fri, 9 May 1997 16:34:09 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 9 May 1997 16:34:09 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199705092334.QAA10124@vader.cs.berkeley.edu>
To: erich@lodgenet.com
CC: tg@ihf.rwth-aachen.de, andreas@klemm.gtn.com, erich@lodgenet.com,
        ports@FreeBSD.ORG
In-reply-to: <199705091222.HAA10953@jake.lodgenet.com> (erich@lodgenet.com)
Subject: Re: a new ports categorie for kdm ?
From: asami@vader.cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami)
Sender: owner-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

 * >Ultimately, I'd like to have all this stuff neatly integrated in the
 * >${X11BASE} hierarchy. It's an X11 package, so it should use the
 * >tree layout X11 already provides.
 * 
 * Yup, I agree, linux app programmers are really good about wanting
 * to stuff a bunch of full-fledged X11-mega-apps in /usr/local/, not
 * even /usr/local/X11. Anyway. my port sets `USE_X11=yes'.

I agree too. :)

Satoshi